|
Home
COMING SOON!
Press Releases

HUD's Broken System
Archives
Binding
Arbitration
Tort
Reform?
Home
Lemon Law
Toxic Mold
Builder
Licensing
Home
Warranties
Editorials
Homeowner
Websites
Construction
Defects
Special
Reports
Donations
Our
Sponsors
Search!
About Us
Links
|
ASBURY
PARK PRESS
THE
JERSEY SHORE'S LARGEST NEWS SOURCE
After
flood of complaints, panel withholds bonds from builder
Published
in the Asbury Park Press 4/01/04
By JAMES QUIRK
FREEHOLD BUREAU
MARLBORO -- If you plan on visiting David Jarashow's back yard on any
given
day, a word of advice: Don't wear nice shoes.
Though it had rained less than half an inch Tuesday night, Jarashow's
back
yard yesterday had the consistency of a sponge. Every step was met
with an
audible "squish," and the yard seemed to be more of a
collection of mud,
netting and hay than an actual lawn.
"When it rains, it's like a river," said Jarashow, who
bought the home for
roughly $450,000 last January. It gets so flooded that Jarashow's
3-year-old
son, Danny, likes to call the back yard "the beach."
Jarashow's drainage problem is not unique among the 70 homes that make
up
the Marlboro Summit development off Tennet Road, adjacent to the
Morganville
Post Office. Roughly 20 residents complained of similar problems last
summer, when the builder, Dan Werbler -- head of the Marlboro Summit
LLC
group -- requested that the project's performance bonds be released.
In what residents and some township officials say was a historic
decision,
the Township Council voted 4 to 0 late last Thursday to not release
the
performance bonds to Werbler. And according to Councilwoman Patricia
Morelli, what truly swayed the council's decision was a supplied video
that
Jarashow shot in his back yard during several storms.
The video shows the back yard transformed into a fast-flowing stream.
The
catch basin drain, which is supposed to handle water from six lots, is
clearly overwhelmed and overflowing.
Despite many complaints from residents of drainage problems, Werbler
requested last year that his phase I and II performance bonds for the
project be released, a move that municipal engineer William Schultz
and
Schoor DePalma, Marlboro's consulting engineering firm, approved in
February.
Performance bonds are paid to a municipality when a builder receives
approvals to build. If the project is built according to code and
passes a
review inspection by township and consulting engineers, the
municipality
usually gives back most of the bond amount. Some funds may be withheld
for a
specific period of time to cover unexpected costs -- these are called
maintenance bonds.
For Marlboro Summit, the phase I performance bond and bank letter of
credit
amount to $316,025; the phase II bond and bank letter come to
$351,139.
Harry Braich, an engineer hired by Jarashow, inspected his property on
Feb.
20. In a direct contradiction to inspection reports issued 14 days
earlier
by Schoor DePalma, the township's consulting engineering firm,
Braich's
report states that little has been done to improve drainage problems
at the
site.
"Considering several serious deficiencies, such release is
premature,"
Braich said of the council's pending decision to release the Marlboro
Summit
project performance bonds to Werbler.
Braich's report, as well as Jarashow's video, had an immediate impact
on the
council.
"The engineering report that Mr. Jarashow gave us said there were
still
problems," Morelli said. "Everyone who looked at (Jarashow's)
tape saw the
flooding problems that have happened, and saw that something should
have
been done to correct them . . You see his children's playsets in a
swamp.
It's terrible."
"I don't know the last time the council refused a bond
release," Mayor
Robert Kleinberg said. "My administration is changing things --
we're not
going to stand up for sub-standard building anymore."
With the council's decision made, the matter will now most likely play
out
in a courtroom, Kleinberg said.
In a brief appearance before the council on March 25, Henry Hill, a
well-known municipal land-use lawyer hired by Werbler, told the
council in
no uncertain terms that his client will sue if the performance bonds
are not
released.
In a statement met by a chorus of derision from residents in the
audience,
Hill told the council, "If you choose to let the homeowners
extort this
builder . . . we will be forced to litigate."James Quirk: (732)
308-7758 or
jquirk@app.com
|