|
Home
COMING SOON!
Press Releases

HUD's Broken System
Archives
Binding
Arbitration
Tort
Reform?
Home
Lemon Law
Toxic Mold
Builder
Licensing
Home
Warranties
Editorials
Homeowner
Websites
Construction
Defects
Special
Reports
Donations
Our
Sponsors
Search!
About Us
Links
|
CONTINUED
|
10/08/2003
The Impact of Environmental Molds in the Home
|
|
By: Anthony
Montanaro, MD, MedScape |
|
|
|
Introduction
In the initial presentation, undertaken by Elliott Horner,
PhD,[1] Microbial Laboratory Director at Air
Quality Sciences, Inc. in Marietta, Georgia, it was pointed
out that environmental molds potentially can result in human
illness by the production of allergens, proteases, beta-glucans,
and volatile organic compounds. Dr. Horner further
emphasized that in order for molds to grow, they require
moisture. The temperature tolerance of molds is extremely
variable. The ecologic types of molds are those included in
the classes of phylloplane, which are molds that can grow on
leaf surfaces. These molds include Cladosporium and
Alternaria. Soil-based molds are typified by
Penicillium and Aspergillus. Typical molds found
in wood decay include the Basidiomycetes. Indoor
molds typically include Alternaria, Cladosporium,
and Epicoccum, but Dr. Horner pointed out that these
are typically from outdoor sources. Dr. Horner pointed out
that in interpreting industrial hygiene reports on mold
measurements, colonization vs contamination must be
determined. When mold contaminates, the mycelial elements
will actually penetrate the substrate. The mycelium is
connected to the conidiophore, which is the reproductive
structure of the mold. The food source for fungal growth in
buildings may include cellulose, which can be found in
ceiling tile, insulation, sheetrock, as well as wood and
dirt.
Biology of Mold in the Home
Dr. Horner reviewed potential detection methodology for
molds. These include the use of direct microscopy or
culture-based methods. Dr. Horner stated that use of "settle
plates" are no longer considered a reliable methodology. Dr.
Horner further noted the importance of taxa identification,
which is much more important than the absolute number of
colony-forming units. Taxa identification may allow
comparisons of indoor vs outdoor taxa.
Doing an Effective Home Assessment M. Joseph Fedoruk, MD,[2]
of Exponent and Associate Clinical Professor at the
University of California, Irvine, California, further
elaborated on the importance of home inspections when
evaluating potential mold contamination. Dr. Fedoruk pointed
out that the home inspection industry is essentially
unregulated. He noted that many home inspectors for mold
contamination, in fact, are qualified only by attending a
meeting without any subsequent testing. Dr. Fedoruk noted
the importance of visual inspection of potential moisture
intrusions, including inspection for the presence of
staining or discoloration. He also pointed out that odor
detection can be quite important and noted that "if you can
smell mold, you have a problem." Dr. Fedoruk also reviewed
air testing methodology surface dust analysis and noted
that, in many cases, "destructive testing" is necessary. He
pointed out that this destructive testing requires actual
destruction of walls or floors.
Dr. Fedoruk also highlighted the importance of measuring
both indoor and outdoor levels of molds as has previously
been noted. He further pointed out that both complaint and
noncomplaint areas of homes must be evaluated. He
re-emphasized that both direct microscopy as well as culture
identification must be undertaken. Dr. Fedoruk also
mentioned that a specific number of colony-forming units are
rarely of any benefit.
Evaluating Patients for Mold Exposure
Emil J. Bardana, Jr., MD,[3] presented the Jean
S. Chapman Keynote Lecture on the potential human health
effects of mold contamination. Dr. Bardana presented the
historical background of mold sensitivity by pointing out
that indoor air quality problems had actually begun in
approximately 1973, following the oil embargo and subsequent
efforts to conserve energy. Subsequently, in 1994, a
paradigm shift had occurred in which individuals who had
previously been diagnosed with "sick building syndrome" were
subsequently informed that they were potentially suffering
from "toxic mold syndrome."
Dr. Bardana highlighted the fact that in any well
constructed home without evidence of water contamination,
significant levels of airborne fungi can be measured. Dr.
Bardana noted that these airborne fungi typically reflect
outdoor levels of fungi. Furthermore, it was noted that
fungi are ubiquitous and, in fact, account for at least 25%
of the earth's biomass. Dr. Bardana again emphasized that
while there were guidelines for the assessment of mold
contamination in homes, there had been no uniformity or
agreement of any specific level that could potentially
result in human disease. In addition, there has been no
established dose-response relationship between mold levels
and human disease. Dr. Bardana gave examples of sawmills
that had been evaluated that revealed workers without
symptoms exposed to 1.5 M cfu/m3. In addition,
there have been studies of farmers without symptoms who were
exposed to 120 M cfu/m3.
Dr. Bardana reviewed the 6 types of human responses
associated with mold exposure. These responses include:
- Potential irritant effect,
which at best is mild and transient and may be associated
with exposure to beta-1,3 glucans or volatile organic
compounds;
- Nonspecific respiratory
symptoms, which are poorly correlated to airborne fungal
levels;
- Allergic sensitization,
which is usually not considered to be severe and is usually
not considered to be a major problem and is more problematic
with outdoor exposures;
- Fungal infections, which
mostly arise from outdoor sources and may occur from
exposure to soil-based saprophytic fungi;
- Exposure to mycotoxins,
which have recently been described. There are currently more
than 300 mycotoxins that have been described that are low in
molecular weight and nonvolatile in nature. Dr. Bardana
highlighted the fact that all species of fungi are capable
of producing mycotoxins; and
- Psychogenic effects, which
can occur when an individual perceives that he or she is
being harmed by the effects of fungal exposure.
These potential health effects of indoor fungal bioaerosol
exposures are highlighted in a recent publication.[4]
Finally, Dr. Bardana outlined the recent health concerns of
individuals exposed to species of Stachybotyrs. Dr.
Bardana reviewed the fact that Stachybotyrs has been
referred to as toxic or "black mold." Dr. Bardana highlighted
the fact that there were, in fact, no bona fide reports of
human infection in the medical literature. Reports of
potential allergic disease have been characterized as being
inconclusive. In fact, Dr. Bardana highlighted a recent
observation that pointed out that half of blood donors have
immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibody to Stachybotyrs, with 9%
of these individuals having evidence of IgE to Stachybotyrs.
Given the ubiquitous nature of Stachybotyrs, it is not
considered to be unusual that one would observe these
findings. Dr. Bardana further noted that there have been no
reports of allergic alveolitis or sinusitis due to
Stachybotyrs. Although there have been recent concerns
regarding the potential of "toxic encephalopathy and
Stachybotyrs," Dr. Bardana pointed out there has been "no
scientific link." Dr. Bardana suggested further reading on the
potential role of Stachybotyrs in a recent publication
by the American Industrial Hygiene Association.[5]
The potential human effects of mold exposure have led to a new
legal industry with devastating impact on the immune insurance
industry. A recent example of mold litigation occurred in
Texas, where a jury determined that an insurance company acted
fraudulently and in bad faith when fixing water damage in a
22-room mansion.[6] This particular case resulted
in a delay in the repair of what many considered a relatively
small innocuous water leak but awarded the homeowner with a
multimillion dollar verdict. It is pointed out that the number
of mold-related claims in the State of Texas alone rose from
7000 in the year 2000 to 37,000 in the year 2001! These claims
were further fueled by the presence of tropical storm Alison,
which occurred in June of 2001 and affected the Houston
metropolitan area for approximately 2 days, resulting in
massive flooding along the Gulf Coast. In Houston alone, there
was a 58% increase in claims, representing 2.96 claims for
every 1000 households. There have been many high profile
lawsuits reported in the press, including that of Johnny
Carson's ex-sidekick, Ed McMahon, who brought suit against his
insurance company for 20 million dollars in April of 2002 for
the death of his dog, which was alleged to have been due to
exposures to mycotoxins from Stachybotyrs chartarum.
Sports stars have not been immune from this weight of
litigation. Michael Jordan has required that his home in the
Washington, DC area at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel have extensive
renovation due to the perception of mold-related problems. The
celebrity status of some of these claims has resulted in
increased hysteria in the general population. The ultimate
effect of this hysterical response to suspected phoma-related
problems has had a tremendous impact on the insurance
industry, with more than 1.3 billion dollars spent in 2002 to
settle lawsuits and mold-related damages.[7]
Unfortunately, the response from the insurance industry has
clearly been to settle cases and to attempt to no longer put
themselves at risk of covering potential mold-related damages.
Recently, the State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
has attempted to eliminate coverage from mold-related damages
in 33 states.
There is little doubt that mold can indeed result in human
disease. Mold exposure can result in allergic rhinitis,
allergic asthma, allergic sinus disease, and pulmonary
hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Despite the fact that there is
no doubt that mold can result in human disease, aside from
these specific incidences, there was very little data to
support human disease caused by "mycotoxins." All of the
presenters emphasized the need for further research in this
area.
References
- Horner E. General sessions.
Environmental molds: biology of molds. Program and abstracts
of the 60th Annual Meeting of the American College of
Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; November 15-20, 2002; San
Antonio, Texas.
- Fedoruk J. General sessions.
Environmental molds: home assessments: how they are done.
Program and abstracts of the 60th Annual Meeting of the
American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; November
15-20, 2002; San Antonio, Texas.
- Bardana EJ. General
sessions. Environmental molds: Jean A. Chapman Lecture.
Health effects of mold exposure and how to evaluate patients
who think they have it. Program and abstracts of the 60th
Annual Meeting of the American College of Allergy, Asthma
and Immunology; November 15-20, 2002; San Antonio, Texas.
- Fung F, Hughson WG. Health
effects of indoor and fungal bioaerosol exposure. Proc
Indoor Air. 2002;1:46-51.
- Page EH, Trout DB. The role
of Stachybotyrs mycotoxins in building-related illness. Amer
Indus Hyg Assoc J. 2001;62:644-648.
- Sharp R. Mold getting a
costly hold on homes. USA Today. June 19, 2002.
- Cahill SF. For some lawyers
mold is gold. Amer Bar Assoc J. December 2001.
|
|
|
|
back |
|