Freddie Mac, the mortgage finance company that last week
ousted its top management amid the fallout over faulty accounting
practices, benefits from a number of federal
government goodies that would make other public companies salivate.
The corporation and its sister company
Fannie Mae are the nation’s two largest sources of home loan
financing. Together they own about $3 trillion in mortgage debt, and
together they comprise almost the entire category of quasi-governmental
corporations known as government-sponsored entitites or GSEs.
The two entities are “private companies with a public mission
subsidized by U.S. taxpayers,” according to FM Watch, a coalition of
financial institutions dedicated to monitoring
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and a longtime critic of the regulatory
framework surrounding the corporations.
That beneficial framework is attracting more than the usual scrutiny
and criticism this week following a management shakeup in which Freddie
Mac's board of directors fired the corporation's president under
allegations of "employee misconduct" and pressured both the CEO and CFO to
resign. The shakeup came six months after Freddie Mac said it would
restate its financial results to reflect additional unreported revenues in
2000, 2001 and 2002.
The little-known benefits Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac receive courtesy
of the federal government are considerable.
Their federal status exempts them from most state and local income
taxes. That exemption along with other benefits saves the companies
hundreds of millions of dollars every year.
The GSEs can borrow money from the Federal Reserve at a lower interest
rate than commercial banks can. In fact, no other entity except for the
U.S. Treasury can borrow money from the Fed at a rate lower than Freddie
Mac and Fannie Mae can.
In addition, each company has a $2.25 billion back-up credit line with
the U.S. Treasury and an implicit—or at least implied—guarantee that the
government would bail out either entity in a crisis. The implied bailout
isn't etched into the GSE's federal charter, but a failure at either
Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would significantly disrupt the nation's flow of
mortgage funds and put trillions of dollars of debt at stake. Investors
rightly or wrongly tend to believe the federal government would take
action to prevent a meltdown from happening.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac also are the only publicly traded companies
that are exempt from U.S. securities laws. Neither is required to file
earnings reports or other disclosures with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, although both companies last year said they voluntarily would
file those reports. Fannie Mae has begun to do so. Freddie Mac has not.
The GSEs also aren't subject to certain provisions of the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act that are supposed to protect individuals' personal financial
information. All other financial institutions are subject to the costly
requirements.
The government perks come with some responsibility. Part of the deal is
that federally chartered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are expected to
stabilize the nation's mortgage market and expand homeownership
opportunities.
Critics charge that Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's quasi-governmental
status has enabled them to balloon to their almost inconceivably huge
sizes.
FM Watch said the GSEs use their advantages to increase stockholder
returns without comparable returns to the nation's home buyers and
taxpayers. The coalition seeks policy initiatives that would shift the
GSEs' focus back to their original mission.