TO SUPPORT A MEANINGFUL, LONG TERM SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM OF THE UNREGULATED HOME BUILDING INDUSTRY.  TO ENCOURAGE  STRICT REGULATION AND STANDARDS ON THE LOCAL, STATE AND NATIONAL LEVELS.  TO PROMOTE AND SUPPORT CONSUMER PROTECTION AND THE PASSAGE OF THE HOME LEMON LAW THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY.
Join Our Email List Register Your Builder Complaint Contact Us
Home

COMING SOON!
Press Releases


HUD's Broken System


Archives
 
Binding
Arbitration

Tort
Reform?

Home
Lemon Law

Toxic Mold

Builder
Licensing

Home
Warranties

Editorials


Featured Websites

Homeowner
Websites

Construction
Defects

Special
Reports

Donations

Our
Sponsors

Search!

About Us

Links

 
For New Homebuyers:
New Home Buyers Guide
Protect Your Investment!
Featured Homebuilders:
  
 


 

Freddie Mac: Private company with public responsibility

Government perks, lax regulation fatten profits at troubled mortgage financier

Monday, June 16, 2003

By Jessica Swesey
Inman News Features


Freddie Mac, the mortgage finance company that last week ousted its top management amid the fallout over faulty accounting practices, benefits from a number of federal government goodies that would make other public companies salivate.

The corporation and its sister company Fannie Mae are the nation’s two largest sources of home loan financing. Together they own about $3 trillion in mortgage debt, and together they comprise almost the entire category of quasi-governmental corporations known as government-sponsored entitites or GSEs.

The two entities are “private companies with a public mission subsidized by U.S. taxpayers,” according to FM Watch, a coalition of financial institutions dedicated to monitoring Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and a longtime critic of the regulatory framework surrounding the corporations.

That beneficial framework is attracting more than the usual scrutiny and criticism this week following a management shakeup in which Freddie Mac's board of directors fired the corporation's president under allegations of "employee misconduct" and pressured both the CEO and CFO to resign. The shakeup came six months after Freddie Mac said it would restate its financial results to reflect additional unreported revenues in 2000, 2001 and 2002.

The little-known benefits Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac receive courtesy of the federal government are considerable.

Their federal status exempts them from most state and local income taxes. That exemption along with other benefits saves the companies hundreds of millions of dollars every year.

The GSEs can borrow money from the Federal Reserve at a lower interest rate than commercial banks can. In fact, no other entity except for the U.S. Treasury can borrow money from the Fed at a rate lower than Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae can.

In addition, each company has a $2.25 billion back-up credit line with the U.S. Treasury and an implicit—or at least implied—guarantee that the government would bail out either entity in a crisis. The implied bailout isn't etched into the GSE's federal charter, but a failure at either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would significantly disrupt the nation's flow of mortgage funds and put trillions of dollars of debt at stake. Investors rightly or wrongly tend to believe the federal government would take action to prevent a meltdown from happening.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac also are the only publicly traded companies that are exempt from U.S. securities laws. Neither is required to file earnings reports or other disclosures with the Securities and Exchange Commission, although both companies last year said they voluntarily would file those reports. Fannie Mae has begun to do so. Freddie Mac has not.

The GSEs also aren't subject to certain provisions of the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that are supposed to protect individuals' personal financial information. All other financial institutions are subject to the costly requirements.

The government perks come with some responsibility. Part of the deal is that federally chartered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are expected to stabilize the nation's mortgage market and expand homeownership opportunities.

Critics charge that Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's quasi-governmental status has enabled them to balloon to their almost inconceivably huge sizes.

FM Watch said the GSEs use their advantages to increase stockholder returns without comparable returns to the nation's home buyers and taxpayers. The coalition seeks policy initiatives that would shift the GSEs' focus back to their original mission.

 

 



 

 

 

 



Last Updated 24/Jun/2003
Disclaimer
The information on this site and all parts of the Homeowners For Better Building site is for information purposes only. By accessing this site you agree to immediately contact Janet Ahmad to report any incorrect data or misrepresentations of facts. Links to other sites are for information purposes only and should not be considered endorsement of the site.

Site Meter