TO SUPPORT A MEANINGFUL, LONG TERM SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM OF THE UNREGULATED HOME BUILDING INDUSTRY.  TO ENCOURAGE  STRICT REGULATION AND STANDARDS ON THE LOCAL, STATE AND NATIONAL LEVELS.  TO PROMOTE AND SUPPORT CONSUMER PROTECTION AND THE PASSAGE OF THE HOME LEMON LAW THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY.
Join Our Email List Register Your Builder Complaint Contact Us
Home

COMING SOON!
Press Releases


HUD's Broken System


Archives
 
Binding
Arbitration

Tort
Reform?

Home
Lemon Law

Toxic Mold

Builder
Licensing

Home
Warranties

Editorials

Homeowner
Websites

Construction
Defects

Special
Reports

Donations

Our
Sponsors

Search!

About Us

Links

For New Homebuyers:
New Home Buyers Guide
Protect Your Investment!
Featured Homebuilders:
  
 

CONTINUED

BUILDING HOMES: BUILDING PROBLEMS

'Good enough' work means shoddy homes

By Dan Tracy
Sentinel Staff Writer

November 2, 2003

James Burgess paid $285,000 for a house that exhibits almost all of the most common flaws vexing new homeowners in greater Orlando.

Like 61 percent of the owners of Central Florida houses built in 2001, he has lived with cracked walls, floors and decking. He had complaints about air conditioning (49 percent); roof and window problems (more than 50 percent); continual puddles in his yard (18 percent); and an unanchored toilet that seeps water (13 percent).

Not to mention shoddy workmanship of the sort that turned up in nearly four out of five houses. He even had two unique flaws: a balcony that could fall and an open, 2-by-4-foot trench in the concrete pad that had been filled with trash and covered with carpet.

"If I had no problems, I would love this house," said Burgess, a 55-year-old retired firefighter. Instead, he said, the past two years have been filled with fights with his builder about repairs.

Burgess owns what could be the poster house for a yearlong investigation of new-home construction in Central Florida by the Orlando Sentinel and WESH-NewsChannel 2.

The reporting included the first-ever statistically valid assessment of construction quality in Florida and perhaps the nation: inspections of 406 homes randomly selected from the nearly 18,000 homes built in the region during 2001. Burgess' home in Kissimmee was one of them.

Those examinations turned up literally thousands of problems, an average of 7.5 per house. They dramatically underscored the systemic problems in the region's residential-construction industry -- homes being built too fast, with not enough skilled workers or oversight -- that almost assure a buyer will encounter quality problems in a new house.

In general, builders refused requests for interviews, contending through spokesmen that they would not be treated fairly. They also argued that many of the problems were minor maintenance matters a homeowner could and should remedy. Serious, legitimate flaws, the builders said, are handled promptly.

The Sentinel/WESH survey, as well as interviews with more than 100 homeowners, found many examples of builders returning to make repairs during the typical one-year warranty period. But in most cases, owners said that getting the work done was a difficult and time-consuming process -- and left them wondering how their homes would hold up as they age.

"It's really scary," Burgess said, "when you see your house falling down around you."

The Sentinel/WESH investigation found:

 

  • A shortage of the skilled workers needed to hammer the nails, set the block and lay the roof shingles. That has opened opportunities for thousands of self-taught carpenters and masons and roofers -- and has lured thousands of undocumented migrants from Mexico to work construction here. Mexicans now constitute a majority of the region's residential-construction workers.

    "You get what comes off the streets. They learn on the job," said Tom Lagomarsino, executive director of the Home Builders Association of Metro Orlando.

     
  • A building code requiring that city and county inspectors examine only the structural integrity and safety of the home they are hired to check. The code prohibits them from checking the quality of work or craftsmanship of a house -- the very aspects that owners value so highly and that many assume the inspectors are reviewing.

    "The truth is you can have some things that aren't very nice, but they meet the code," said Larry Goldman, Seminole County's chief building official.

     
  • Building inspectors who -- like the contractors whose work they are supposed to check -- are often overworked and uncritical. Sentinel/WESH reporters found numerous examples of inspectors checking 60 houses a day -- triple what's considered a reasonable workload. One inspector in Lake County approves more than 99 percent of his inspections the first time; for Osceola County, the average for its inspectors is 94 percent.

    "You can't get away from the fact that they are not taking as much time as they should. You can't run away from that," said Mike Rhodes, Orlando's chief building official.

    'Concerned about quantity'

    Production, or tract, companies built nearly 80percent of the houses in the computerized study -- at least 312 -- including the one Burgess bought.

    The remaining 94 were built by a variety of companies, many of them custom builders, which typically are local businesses that construct fewer -- but more costly -- houses. Generally, custom homes had the same problems as production houses. But there were not enough custom homes in the database to draw statistically valid conclusions.

    Complaints about shoddy construction, particularly by production builders, do not surprise Ron Resch, a veteran private building inspector, former general contractor and paid consultant to the Sentinel and WESH.

    "They're not concerned about quality; they're concerned about quantity," he said.

    With the exception of Pringle Development, which builds "active retirement" communities in Lake County, the top production builders in the Sentinel/WESH survey declined repeated requests for comment, as did other builders mentioned in this story.

    Those builders, through a spokesman, questioned the validity of the inspections because they were not conducted by professionals, but by industrial-engineering students at the University of Central Florida. The students were trained and supervised by Resch and two UCF professors who research quality and process issues for manufacturers of home components in the Mid-Atlantic states.

    Alex Hannigan, president of the Home Builders Association of Metro Orlando and himself a custom builder, acknowledged that production builders -- some of which build hundreds of homes each year in the Central Florida market -- can have quality-control problems. But he said they're not deliberate.

    "I don't think they're out there to say, 'Listen, let's see how we can screw a homeowner,'" Hannigan said. "I think it's something that's falling through the cracks. I can't believe that their corporate philosophy is, 'Let's see what we can get away with.'"

    Alan Parrow, Pringle Development's director of marketing, sales and design, said his company works hard at constructing a well-built house and reacts promptly when a homeowner complains.

    "We're proud of what we do," he said. Resch and other critics say the production builders, as well as many custom builders, are overwhelmed by demand sparked by Central Florida's growth and low interest rates. In 2001 alone, about 18,000 new homes were built in the six-county Central Florida region; this year, as many as 23,000 are projected to be built.

    With a largely unskilled work force that is rushing to keep pace, the builders make continual mistakes.

    "It's 'Hurry up and get this done. Don't worry about what it looks like,'" Resch said.

    That explanation sounds plausible to Burgess, who lived in LaBelle in South Florida with his family while their house was being built and was unable to check its progress very often.

    One of the times he did visit, however, he saw the 2-foot-by-4-foot-by-5-inch-deep trench in the concrete pad, running from the dining room to the kitchen. It was chiseled into the pad, Burgess said, because electrical wires initially were misplaced and had to be rerouted.

    He asked that it be filled in before he, his wife and three children moved in during November 2001 -- and was told it would be taken care of.

    Trench full of trash

    It was not. After Burgess moved in, he pulled up the carpet and the foam pad beneath it to see whether the repairs had been made, and saw the trench was filled with wadded-up cigarette packs, discarded butts and crushed aluminum cans.

    He called his builder, U.S. Home, for repairs, triggering a drawn-out series of warranty requests that continue to this day. The builder, he said, did not get really serious about his problems until June, when he told it that an inspector from the Sentinel/WESH was going to look at the house in the Hawk's Nest subdivision.

    The trench -- now filled with a concretelike material -- was one of the less significant flaws he encountered with the house.

    More worrisome to him have been the roof and window leaks; two upstairs toilets that dripped water and damaged the ceilings in two first-floor rooms; varying temperatures in his second-floor bedrooms; and cracking stucco on his second story.

    All those issues, except the stucco, have been repaired or soon will be, he said. The stucco is so thinly and badly applied that it is falling off in small chunks, largely around a crack running along one side of the house that starts as a hairline but widens enough to hold two quarters.

    Burgess fears that much of the stucco may come off eventually, as he said happened to the house next door. An attempted fix of the neighbor's house has languished for more than four months, with much of one wall still swathed in plastic wrap. U.S. Home has not yet offered Burgess a plan for what will be done for him.

    But the builder has, he said, pledged to put new support beams under the balcony that opens off of his second-floor master bedroom. The original beams are cracked, and an independent inspector hired by U.S. Home recommended they be replaced for fear the balcony might collapse if too many people stood on it.

    The builder also put extra drains in his neighborhood to reduce the constant puddling, Burgess said. The work has helped, but he said his yard and many others in the subdivision remain almost constantly wet.

    Kim Mulligan has faced some of  the same problems that plague Burgess. But she's satisfied that her builder -- Morrison Homes -- has addressed the flaws in her $269,000 house in Heathrow in Seminole County.

    Her roof sprang a leak earlier this year in a bad storm, staining a corner of her living room. Morrison has plugged it and soon will repair the interior damage as well, said Mulligan, 43, a medical/legal consultant.

    "They've lived up to their promises," Mulligan said of Morrison, "but it's just disturbing when you have a new house and you have a roof leak."

    She also has had plenty of cracking of her exterior walls and a large crack in her garage floor. Again, Morrison has filled, caulked or painted over the flaws, she said.

    Mulligan's biggest concern now is that some of the nails that were hammered into the drywall are popping out. She thinks the house is settling, or shifting, as the ground adjusts to the weight of the concrete pad.

    Thomas Fisher's foundation seems OK; it's the interior finish of his $277,000 house in Waterford Lakes that upsets him. Some walls are not flat, a fact he learned when he tried to install chair rails in the dining room.

    He wanted to glue the rails on, but the gap was too big in some areas because of the wall's "wavy" undulations. He resorted to screwing them into the metal studs.

    Fisher, a 63-year-old retired steel-plant manager, found one advantage to uneven walls. He figured he would have to drill holes in the wall to run the wires and plugs that connect and power his entertainment equipment from one shelf to the next. But the "waves" were so pronounced, he said, he could slip everything in the space between the shelves and the walls of his Centex home.

    "There's no quality control exercised at all," he said.

    Inspector: Workers lack pride

    Alan Mooney, president of Criterium Engineers, a national home-inspection company, hears such criticisms and his employees see similar flaws all the time, locally and nationally.

    He blames much of the sloppy work on the loss of personal pride by many workers and the "good enough" attitude of many builders.

    Usually, Mooney said, no one is on the job at a house from beginning to end. Even job superintendents, particularly for production builders, come and go, meaning the person in charge of overseeing construction of a house can change several times before completion.

    And the workers come in only for a specified task -- framing or building block walls, for instance -- then leave.

    "Good work or bad, individual effort mostly goes unnoticed," said Mooney, whose company operates in Central Florida.

    Rushed builders also tend to set lower standards, he said. So if a corner is not perfectly square or a wall is a little out of line, he said, it becomes "good enough."

    That attitude could lie behind many of the discoveries in the Sentinel/WESH survey, particularly when it comes to the final look and feel of a house. Some findings:

     
  • More than 40 percent of the homes had walls and ceilings that were not straight, had waves in them, were cracked or had drywall nails popping out.

    Bill Braun, a 64-year-old disabled electrician, has drywall in his $143,000 house in DeBary that was not completely hammered into the wood framing behind it. He can push the drywall in more than an inch and watch it spring back.

    "Isn't that something?" he said.

     
  • Seventeen percent of the houses had cabinet shelves missing the middle supports. That can cause the shelves to sag and even break over time.

    "It concerns me," said Jay Miller, a 42-year-old computer-project engineer. "It's one of those things that should have been done."

    He spent $320,000 for his custom house in Winter Garden. The holes for the support pegs are missing for two long shelves in the kitchen, Miller said, but he figures they are strong enough to hold the items placed there.

     
  • Fifty-two houses had toilets that weren't anchored properly or leaked, just like Burgess'.

    "It's pretty bad," said Alberto Sabat, a 45-year-old immigration agent.

    Sabat, who paid $117,000 for his house near Kissimmee, said his builder went out of business, leaving him to fix the toilet and lots of other flaws, including soffits that were falling off, a cracked garage floor and driveway and no insulation in the attic.

    "There's nothing critical," he said, "but it's just a lot of stuff."

     
  • An additional 26 houses did not have the stoves attached to the wall, meaning they could tip over accidentally. That is an apparent code violation.

    Ron Ozut, whose grandchildren occasionally visit his $150,000 house in Clermont, said he intends to call the builder, Levitt and Sons, to secure his stove to the wall.

    "I'll get it done," said Ozut, a retired postal clerk.

     
  • Fifteen homes had carpet that was fraying or lumpy or coming up in the corners.

    The effect of all these problems -- big and small -- is not that houses all over Central Florida soon will collapse, but that they will wear poorly over time.

    Without repairs, they will look shabby within a few years and, in some instances, even sag.

    Such homes, experts say, will not increase as much in value over time and cost the owners more than a well-constructed house in upkeep and replacement expenses.

    "I think they are throwing these things up," said Sharon McLearn, a Winter Park Realtor. "There is no pride. That day is gone."

    Dan Tracy can be reached at 407-872-7200, Category 5483, or dtracy@orlandosentinel.com.

    Copyright © 2003, Orlando Sentinel

  •  

     
     
     

    back


    Last Updated 11/26/2003
    Disclaimer
    The information on this site and all parts of the Homeowners For Better Building site is for information purposes only. By accessing this site you agree to immediately contact Janet Ahmad to report any incorrect data or misrepresentations of facts. Links to other sites are for information purposes only and should not be considered endorsement of the site.

    Site Meter