HomeLatest NewsFeatured HomebuildersHome Buyer ResourcesBinding ArbitrationResource LinksSubmit ComplaintsView ComplaintsTake Action 101!Report Mortgage FraudMortgage Fraud NewsForeclosure NewsConstruction DefectsHome DefectsPhoto GalleryFoundation ProblemsHomeowner Website LinksHOA Reform
Main Menu
Home
Latest News
Featured Homebuilders
Home Buyer Resources
Binding Arbitration
Resource Links
Submit Complaints
View Complaints
Take Action 101!
Report Mortgage Fraud
Mortgage Fraud News
Foreclosure News
Construction Defects
Home Defects
Photo Gallery
Foundation Problems
Homeowner Website Links
HOA Reform
Featured Topics
Builder Death Spiral
Report Mortgage Fraud
Foreclosure Special Report
Mold & New Home Guide
Special News Reports
Centex & Habitability
How Fast Can They Build Them?
TRCC Editorial
Texas TRCC Scandal
Texas Watch - Tell Lawmakers
TRCC Recommendations
Sandra Bullock
People's Lawyer
Prevent Nightmare Homes
Choice Homes
Smart Money
Weekly Update Message
HOBB Archives
About HOBB
Contact Us
Fair Use Notice
Legislative Work
Your House

 HOBB News Alerts
and Updates

Click Here to Subscribe

Support HOBB - Become a Sustaining Member
Who's Online
ABC Special Report
Investigation: New Home Heartbreak
Trump - NAHB Homebuilders Shoddy Construction and Forced Arbitration
Homebuilder Money, Binding Arbitration & Using Docotors
Sunday, 06 February 2005
Houston Chronicle
Power tale: Mugging Dr. Welby
By RICK CASEY
A
recent study showing that homebuilders have contributed $9 million to state officials in the past four years raised a simple question.What are they getting for their money? The Austin-based reform organization that conducted the study, Campaigns for People, accused legislators of responding by setting up the Texas Residential Construction Commission... Richard Weekley, a Houston real estate developer (and part owner of his brother's David Weekley Homes), wrote a letter to Gov. Perry...

Houston Chronicle
Power tale: Mugging Dr. Welby
By RICK CASEY
Feb. 5, 2005
A recent study showing that homebuilders have contributed $9 million to state officials in the past four years raised a simple question.What are they getting for their money?

The Austin-based reform organization that conducted the study, Campaigns for People, accused legislators of responding by setting up the Texas Residential Construction Commission.

The reformers say this commission, headed by gubernatorial appointees, most of whom have ties to the industry, is a cruel hoax on homebuyers.

Homebuilders disagree, saying the commission provides a fair process for disputes that keeps people out of court.

Whichever it is, I think homebuilders should get more than one bureaucracy for $9 million.

Maybe they did.

In the spring of 2001, the Texas Medical Association and the state's hospitals asked the Legislature to pass the "Prompt Pay" bill. It required HMOs and other insurance companies to pay undisputed medical bills within 45 days or face stiff penalties.

A shocking veto

Doctors being more popular than HMOs, it passed both houses without dissent.

On June 4, Gov. Rick Perry gave an address to the Texas Hospital Association.

"Isn't it time that you worried more about providing the right care than getting paid in a reasonable amount of time?" he asked the gathering. "I think it's time for us as a state to strengthen our laws and regulations, which we did this last session, to require prompt payment of a physician or other health care provider."

Imagine the surprise of those hospital executives and of doctors when Perry vetoed the bill 13 days later.

What happened? On June 8, Richard Weekley, a Houston real estate developer (and part owner of his brother's David Weekley Homes), wrote a letter to Gov. Perry.

The letter was on the letterhead of Texans for Lawsuit Reform, of which Weekley was president. Weekley asked the governor to veto the bill.

Why? Because of a provision in the bill that would prohibit insurers from requiring all disputes with medical providers to be settled by binding arbitration.

The doctors and hospitals wanted such language because HMOs and insurance companies were forcing them to agree to mandatory arbitration. If they didn't agree, the insurance companies would not put them on approved lists for full payment, thereby depriving them of patients.

Doctors, who aren't generally fond of lawsuits, didn't like mandatory arbitration for a number of reasons. The insurance companies knew the individual arbitrators better (some contracts barred doctors from disclosing arbitration results to other doctors). Well-paid arbitrators looking for repeat business would be hesitant to rule consistently against insurers, and their decisions could not be appealed no matter how unreasonable.

Doctors would be free, under the bill, to agree to arbitration or other avenues after a dispute arose. But Texans for Lawsuit Reform officials say it's very difficult to get people to arbitration after a dispute arises.

"No public policy is served by mandating that a contractual dispute must be pursued in the court system when the parties to the contract desire to agree otherwise," Weekley wrote to Perry.

Weekley's argument was backed up by the fact that members of Texans for Lawsuit Reform were Perry's single largest contributor bloc, having donated $3.2 million to him, according to an August 2001 analysis by the Dallas Morning News.

Leaving nothing to chance, prominent TLR members threw money at Perry in the period between the close of the session (when contributions are banned) and the deadline for vetoes.

Houston homebuilder Bob Perry (no relation to the governor) sent in $50,000. Others sent checks for $25,000.

Ironically, doctors and the Texas Medical Association had been part of TLR, but nobody had raised the issue with them. They felt they had been mugged by their friends.

TMA leaders were so outraged that though doctors traditionally lean Republican, they endorsed Perry's opponent the next year, Democrat Tony Sanchez.

It is a testament to the power of Texans for Lawsuit Reform that they could get the governor to anger the doctors. But why would TLR go to the mat over that one clause?

Is it because most homebuilding companies make compulsory arbitration a condition of buying a house?

"They saw it as the camel's nose under the tent," said one doctor.

Ken Hoagland, lobbyist and spokesman for TLR, disagrees.

"That's just spin," he says. "Weekley's a homebuilder, but homebuilders' perspective hasn't had any impact at all on the TLR point of view. We have a much broader perspective.

"It's a policy question," he said. "Can you outlaw alternative dispute resolution? Is that a good idea?"

Unsaid: If you let doctors reject mandatory arbitration, someone might get the idea of letting homebuyers reject it.

Avoiding that is worth mugging Marcus Welby, M.D.

You can write to Rick Casey at P.O. Box 4260, Houston, TX 77210, or e-mail him at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 
< Prev   Next >
Search HOBB.org

Reckless Endangerment
BY: GRETCHEN MORGENSON
and JOSHUA ROSNER

Outsized Ambition, Greed and
Corruption Led to
Economic Armageddon


Amazon
Barnes & Noble

NPR Special Report
Part I Listen Now
Perry Home - No Warranty 
Part II Listen Now
Texas Favors Builders

Washington Post
The housing bubble, in four chapters
BusinessWeek Special Reports
Bonfire of the Builders
Homebuilders helped fuel the housing crisis
Housing: That Sinking Feeling

Consumer Affairs Builder Complaints

IS YOUR STATE NEXT?
As Goes Texas So Goes the Nation
Knowledge and Financial Responsibility are still Optional for Texas Home Builders

OUTSTANDING FOX4 REPORT
TRCC from Bad to Worse
Case of the Crooked House

TRCC AN ARRESTING EXPERIENCE
The Pat and Bob Egert Building & TRCC Experience 

Build it right the first time
An interview with Janet Ahmad

Bad Binding Arbitration Experience?
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
or call 1-210-402-6800

top of page

© 2024 HomeOwners for Better Building
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.