HomeLatest NewsFeatured HomebuildersHome Buyer ResourcesBinding ArbitrationResource LinksSubmit ComplaintsView ComplaintsTake Action 101!Report Mortgage FraudMortgage Fraud NewsForeclosure NewsConstruction DefectsHome DefectsPhoto GalleryFoundation ProblemsHomeowner Website LinksHOBB Forum

 Rise and Fall of Predatory Lending and Housing
NY Times: Building Flawed American Dreams 

Henry Cisneros on the hot seat
Editorial Prediction: Nov 5, 2006
Recipe for Profits

Homewreckers Cisneros & Martinez

FOX Interview

Main Menu
Home
Latest News
Featured Homebuilders
Home Buyer Resources
Binding Arbitration
Resource Links
Submit Complaints
View Complaints
Take Action 101!
Report Mortgage Fraud
Mortgage Fraud News
Foreclosure News
Construction Defects
Home Defects
Photo Gallery
Foundation Problems
Homeowner Website Links
HOBB Forum
Featured Topics
Builder Death Spiral
Report Mortgage Fraud
Foreclosure Special Report
Mold & New Home Guide
Special News Reports
Centex & Habitability
How Fast Can They Build Them?
KBHome Complaints
TRCC Editorial
Texas TRCC Scandal
Texas Watch - Tell Lawmakers
TRCC Recommendations
Sandra Bullock
NEW! KB Defies FTC
KB Stock Down
People's Lawyer
Prevent Nightmare Homes
KB Home vs. kbhomesucks.com
Choice Homes
Smart Money
Weekly Update Message
Old HOBB Site
HOBB Archives
About HOBB
Contact Us
Fair Use Notice
Legislative Work
Your House

 HOBB News Alerts
and Updates

Click Here to Subscribe

Login to Hobb
Welcome Guest






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Support HOBB - Become a Sustaining Member

Enter Amount:
$

Who's Online
We have 6 guests and 3 members online
HOBB Community
January 07, 2009, 07:12:13 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to HOBB Forums
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Why Are SLAPP-suits becoming the norm of control over taxpayers/consumers?  (Read 5707 times)
responsible_dvlpmnt
Newbie
*
Posts: 36


View Profile
« on: September 22, 2006, 01:24:30 pm »

See http://www.hobb.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1174&Itemid=197

Many of the cases here are consumers who are victims of SLAPP-suits. These are legal tools (illegal in 24 states but not Texas) used by corporate America to silence less powerful critics. They started in the environmental movement in the 60s-70s and moved in the 80s-90s to the middle class sparking a back-lash in many state legislatures which passed consumer protection through anti-SLAPP legislation. --Texas has tried several times but failed due to the same lobby which pushed through the TRCC...
Logged
Janet Ahmad
Administrator
Full Member
*****
Posts: 108


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2006, 09:31:51 am »

Shooting themselves in the feet
Thank you for the facts about SLAPP-suits.
It's worth repeating: “Sitterle’s has done the unthinkable by filing a suit to oppress the free speech of a US Army Colonel who continues to serve his country, which creates a scandal that even the building industry must find outrageous.”  We must see to it that this episode will not go unnoticed.

Perhaps now we will hear from those respectable builders who build decent homes and care about how badly it reflects on their industry.  However, based on their past performance I predict the building industry will be conspicuously silent, unless it begins to reflect on their business.

This event should outrage all Americans and we must all express our outrage to our elected officials and to the press by writing letters to the editors of every paper, radio and TV station in the nation.  Hopefully news coverage will make Sitterle Homes and other irresponsible builders to think twice before displaying their lack of integrity so publicly.

Unfortunately Choice Homes filed another brazen SLAPP-suit on a family this past Thursday.  More on that bizarre event later…… 
« Last Edit: September 23, 2006, 12:05:55 pm by Janet Ahmad » Logged

When it happens to you, it doesn't really matter how many good houses are out there, now does it?
marc
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 649


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2006, 12:39:46 pm »

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment 
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. "

What have I missed? I do not remember seeing any headlines that said our government has done  away with our First Amendment Rights.
Is America still a country with a democratic government or is it a country where big  business supercedes all else?
I saw on the news recently where a toy set is being recalled because a child choked on a part and died. Who recalls homes that  are built defectively that may cause huge and sometimes grave results. No-One. No one cares what happens when you end up in a defective home except you.
To add insult to injury if you talk up and make it known what has happened to  you may get slapped w/ a suit.
Has anyone heard of others who report defective products getting slapped? I personally have not.
What has happened to our country? What has happened to a work ethic and  caring what you have produced? Doesn't matter as long as you get your money.
Can anyone imagine an active military person getting slapped because of the problems he has had and speaking up.
I can only shake my head and wonder whatever happened to a country that used to be.  Today, as a very wise little boy told me, "It's all about the MONEY"!
 Huh


 
« Last Edit: October 01, 2006, 10:03:03 am by marc » Logged
Jane Doe
Full Member
***
Posts: 185


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2006, 10:25:36 pm »

This site has a link for anti-slapp rules in other states, but the site is primarily about CA. http://www.casp.net/  Yes, other types of entities have filed SLAPP suits to shut someone up.  It's not unique to the building industry.  Just ask the host of http://www.ripoffreport.com Ed Magedson, he has been SLAPPED by various (non builder) companies for his complaint site.  Sometimes these suits are purely frivolous, meant to scare off complainers.  Other times they are borderline, and that's why people have to be so very careful when they set up "hate sites" etc about a company.  I have not seen the sites in question yet.  There are two that you're talking about, right?  Sitterle and Choice Homes? 
Logged
Janet Ahmad
Administrator
Full Member
*****
Posts: 108


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2006, 06:59:45 am »

HomeOwners for Better Building
PRESS RELEASE
                                     
Hirata vs Sitterle Homes
Thursday, September 28, 2005
Bexar County Court House

Trial begins in the face of builder’s attempts to deprive US Army Colonel of Constitutional Rights
         
        San Antonio –  The trial of active duty US Army Colonel Jay Hirata and wife, retired Lieutenant Colonel Joy Hirata, a 31-year Army Veteran verses homebuilder Sitterle Homes begins tomorrow.

Last week Colonel Hirata and Joy had planned to speak to the Mayor and City Council members to express their concerns for careless building practices in San Antonio and inadequate city inspections. However, on September 18, 2006 the homebuilder, Sitterle Corporation, unexpectedly filed a defamation suit against Colonel Hirata for filing a public complaint about their defective home. 

After two years of amassing thousands of dollars in legal fees, the Hiratas obtained favorable rulings from the state agency TRCC, the Third Party Inspector (assigned by the TRCC), and the TRCC Appellate Panel regarding multiple construction defects.  Despite the confirmation of the defects in the home, Sitterle failed to make the repairs so the couple filed a lawsuit against Sitterle Homes regarding their 2-year-old home that has water intrusion issues in the basement.

During these difficult times, the couple has been apart 15 months due to the on-going litigations and inability to sell their home.  Colonel Hirata was transferred to a NATO assignment in Spain while his wife was forced to remain behind and handle the demanding legal matters.   

Recently, Colonel Hirata expressed his frustrations publicly regarding their ordeal and of dealing with the much-criticized TRCC system, and its inability to force the Sitterle Corporation to remedy the construction defects with their home as outlined by the TRCC.

The couple wrote local, state, and congressional leaders, local military installations within San Antonio and consumer organizations, and posted a complaint on the HOBB.org website expressing frustration over the inability to hold Sitterle accountable.

In this unprecedented move, Sitterle’s has filing a suit to oppress the free speech of a US Army Colonel who continues to serve his country, which creates a scandal that even the building industry must find outrageous. 

According to the Colonel in a written statement, this experience with the TRCC and the Sitterle Corporation has been more stressful than his combat tours in Iraq (Operation Iraqi Freedom) and Pakistan (Operation Enduring Freedom) combined.
 
This family has endured an unnecessary separation, financial hardship and stress which was preventable.  They should be enjoying their lives together, but instead have suffered through the TRCC process and litigation, and now face another war on the home front, to defend the right of free speech in what is seen as a frivolous lawsuit designed to intimidate.

Janet Ahmad, National President
   

Logged

When it happens to you, it doesn't really matter how many good houses are out there, now does it?
responsible_dvlpmnt
Newbie
*
Posts: 36


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2006, 05:00:47 pm »

Janet, Rumple & All,

http://www.fortbendnow.com/news/719/activist-slaps-back-in-countersuit-against-sienna-plantation-developer

I've added a link to a case we are very familiar with in our neighborhood. Texas needs anti-SLAPP legislation like Missouri and other states. For gods sake Arkansas and Louisiana have anti-SLAPP. I do like the post of an earlier writer who stated the obvious that why do we need additional laws when the constitution protects these rights? Over the last decade so called conservative (not real conservatives because real conservatives defend the constitution to the death) politicians have staked the local and state courts with former corporate attorneys (not constitutional ones) thus an imbalance whereby everything is seen as a contract not as rights grounded in our const.

It's time we took back our legislatures and courts from these pretenders! Get active today. Ck out the many abuses at http://www.ahrc.com and keep posting here. Start groups in your neighborhood like we did. They will target you and come after you but stand together and fight back. We've spent nearly 60K already in our case but they have dropped the committee from the suit (some progress). Of course they did this to further isolate but we will fight on! We want to wish the Colonel and his family the best in his fight and we hope he will see this as a real threat to the American dream. Good luck and vote NO on TUPCA (contact your legislatures and tell them now). This bill will give away more of the bath water (homeowners rights -- it was crafted by the industry attorneys who stand to benefit most)...
Logged
Janet Ahmad
Administrator
Full Member
*****
Posts: 108


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2006, 09:14:51 pm »

It’s my opinion that the builder, Sitterle Homes has shot themselves in the feet.

You see, the press was all over this story and the court room was filed with cameras when the trial began last Thursday.  I dare say this case would have gone unnoticed but for the unwise decision by Sitterle Homes to so shamelessly try to intimidate an active duty Colonel with a frivolous lawsuit.

Have builders gone mad with their sense of power? What it comes down to is a very public display of arrogance by Sitterle attempting to suppress free speech of a unhappy customer that would have otherwise gone unnoticed.

Not a wise decision, but one that will definately send a message to other builders - that it is wise to assure that homeowners are happy customers.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2006, 11:58:43 pm by Janet Ahmad » Logged

When it happens to you, it doesn't really matter how many good houses are out there, now does it?
responsible_dvlpmnt
Newbie
*
Posts: 36


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2006, 08:26:45 am »

Janet-

So true. In our case the developer didn't seem that concerned. He even made a comment like the neg. press hasn't hurt sales (it is pretty arrogant). We need legislative reform and to get their people out of the state house, courts, local commissions and councils. We can only do that by networking as consumers of their product and that's what really worries them. I don't think they're anymore concerned about individuals than an elephant would be about ants (until the ants act in unison). Stay in touch and keep us posted!
Logged
Sherry Freeland
Newbie
*
Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2006, 09:12:45 pm »

We just got slapped!...and are continuing to exercise our freedom of speech until ordered to do otherwise. We don't hand over our American civil rights that easily.

We do not understand why builders would feel it to be more important to sue their customers and try to take away their constitutional rights rather than to do the right thing.

Before buying a home in the State of Texas, we had no idea we would have be expected to forfeit our freedom of speech should something go wrong. Are you sure this is the USA Huh   

www.choicehomescomplaint.com

Watch our website and see if it disappears!   

Logged
Hooch
Newbie
*
Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 12, 2006, 06:50:20 am »

http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA101206.01E.SitterleSettles_1012.2892c0f.html

What a shame that the Hiratas did not see this through to completion. The builder must have known that the court case was likely not going in their favor.

So, rather than have the testimony and verdict available for public review, they settle. This could have established precedent that would help future homeowners.

Instead, the builder with deep pockets wins again. Not only do they intimidate the public by filing a lawsuit, they force the Hiratas to spend time and money defending their case. If the Hiratas had given up at any point before trial, then the builder would half won again.

In addition, the public bears the cost of another friviolos case tying up the court system.

The laws should be changed so that a court trial, once started, cannot be withdrawn by either side for a private settlement.
Logged
Jane Doe
Full Member
***
Posts: 185


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 12, 2006, 09:22:10 pm »

Sherry, builders will deny fault til the cows come home rather than let it be known to who knows how many other customers that their house might have the same mistakes.  SLAPP suits are an act of desperation.

Hooch, I don't begrudge anyone the ability to take a settlement and put an end to the agony.  Besides, even if they had gone to trial, won and even collected, the case might not set any new precedent.   Lawyers could not draw on the Hiratas case as case law, unless it was a reported case, and most of the time they are not reported unless they are appealed and some legal question has been answered that wasn't adequately answered before.  The only thing new about this case, probably, was the TRCC.  There will be more cases about that, to be sure.  In the meantime IMO we can't expect families to sacrifice themselves for the possibility of setting a precedent.  Very few of us can afford to do that.  I hope they got a good settlement. 

In my case settling meant recovering most of my damages which is all i ever asked for.  To go to court would be to MAYBE win the same amount and have to hand over a big chunk of it to a lawyer.  No thanks.
Logged
responsible_dvlpmnt
Newbie
*
Posts: 36


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: October 21, 2006, 06:56:38 am »

Jane,

I would have to agree with much of what you are saying. We just went through summary judgement in a county that this developer, who sold us our land and then withheld vital info on land use in our community (what was coming via them), contributes to several of the judges superiors (county commissioners) and has many county contracts. Needless to say not much of our counter-claims survived. They even got the former pres. of the HAR (Houston Association of Realtors) to testify for them on our damage claim. We are moving forward with the case (current legal costs for us in the $60-70k range). It's only justice in Texas (judge Roy Bean style). Only when the cameras come do you have a chance. Our media faded after about 6 months and we are in year 2 (just try and face the PR machine of the mega-developers and their political cronies). These cases, when not settled early, range 3-13 years (Canen & Pring, 1996). Texas Watch reported that the TX judicial is probably one of the least consumer friendly in this area of the country. So far that has been our experience.

Get more at http://missouricitychatter.blogspot.com
Logged
Rumple Stiltskin
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 85


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: October 21, 2006, 07:54:51 am »

IN MY OPINION, WHICH IS BASED ON MY EXPERIENCE, THERE IS NOT A LEGAL PRODUCT AVAILABLE IN THE MARKETPLACE TODAY WHICH CARRIES THE DEGREE OF POTENTIAL FINANCIAL AND EMOTIONAL RISK FOR THE PURCHASER AS DOES THAT OF A NEW HOUSE.

Your control is now, not later.

Many web site references have been trucated by unknown systems/parties making their access difficult.  A little persisitence, ingenuity, and creativity in a search engine should help with access.

Visit Homeowners Against Deficient Dwellings, HADD.com, HOBB.org, Homeowners For Better Building, WESH.com, Building Houses: Building Problems, Consumer Reports' research study: Housewrecked--link available at the HADD web site, 10 Things Your House Builder Won't Tell You, www.smartmoney.com/consumer/index.cfm?st... an00, 10 Things Your Attorney Won't Tell You, www.smartmoney.com/consumer/index.cfm?st... ctober03, How To Prevent A New House Nightmare, www.lakesidepress.com/dreams/section4.ht... Shoddy Building in the Housing Boom? Business Week April 25, 2003, www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/apr... _1874_db035.htm, Exposing New Home Builders, exposingnewhomebuilders.typepad.com/newhomebuildersnews blog/,
(some builder specific web sites have been effectively eliminated), ourrylandhomes.com(use google.com for this one: our ryland homes), paltryhomes.com, jdpowers.com, kbhomesucks.com, kbhomestink.org, The Pulte Home Experience, www.trendzweb.com/pulte/.,or,...... http://home.att.net/~pulte/,............... paylessbills.com/richmond_american.htm, drhortonlemonhome.com, drhortonsux.com, mybadhouse.com/pages/1/index.htm, Home sweet crooked house, money.cnn.com/2004/06/09/real_estate/buying_selling/hom edefects/index.htm, bankrate.com/brm/news/real-estate/20040812a1.asp, Monday, June 21
New-home warranties not what they are cracked up to be bankrate.com/brm/news/real-estate/BuyerGuide2004/fthb-b log-archive.asp, webgripesites.com, mymccrearyhomesucks.com/, w3.ripoffreport.com/reports/ripoff76506.htm, Home-building report/broken system, www.app.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/2... /504200384/1030, www.screwedcentral.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/0... http://keepernsol.com/RyanHomes/Ryan_pag... www.constructiondefects.com,...... NPR.org, All Things Considered, 7/8/04, Your Money, "Confusion, Ire Over Lemon Housing Law", Building with Richmond Homes, http://www.orion77.com/,http......://satanscit... hive.html, Saturday December 17, 2005, June 21st entry, "Home Builder Reviews" http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.c... choicehomescomplaint.com, myrottlundhome.com, missouricitychatter.blogspot.com,
and ANY search engine (new house construction, lawsuits, defects, complaints, etc.), to examine the 'ISOLATED','ANECDOTAL' nature of this issue, to separate 'FACT' from 'INNUENDO', and to gain insight into the business practices of the corporate/public new house building industry, determine and evaluate the 'weasel' factor, and to protect your financial and emotional interests. Reading the court cases available on-line is a good idea, too.

Your due diligence is only effective BEFORE the fact.
I wish you well.
Read more: To access the following, copy and paste the quote below into a Google search.

www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/local/7...

"Hovnanian's letter to the homeowners claims that 'when there is a problem, we make things right,' " Spatz said. "After several years and a long legal battle, I am still waiting for that to happen."

Believe what you want. Protect your interests before the fact. Do not make the mistake that I did. Justice delayed, justice denied?

"Freedom, democracy, rule of law, these are the safeguards for coping with human nature",Clifford May, president of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.
Logged
responsible_dvlpmnt
Newbie
*
Posts: 36


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: December 10, 2006, 07:20:21 pm »

SLAPP-suit update (12/10/06):

Living and owning a home in a state where developers and builders write in "none suit clauses" into their contracts increases the risk of owning a home (like we don't have enough risk already attached). It's increased more when these same corporations target groups or individual consumers who actively complain (or petition their government for redress of greviances -- perfectly legal and supposedly protected under the state and federal constitution, but is it?).

In 24 states, after a surge of SLAPP-suits over several decades, legislatures began to add statutory protections stopping SLAPP-suits before they can severely harm families/consumers. Since developers/builders use these tools to silence most often (Canen & Pring, 1996) they resisted in many states. In Texas the lobby blocked four fairly recent attemtps. Where does this leave you?

In our case, after nearly 2 years of litigation in a developer friendly court, we ended up settling. We consider it a stale-mate that cost the company conservatively attacking us close to half a million dollars (of course it cost us our life savings defending it). We encourage those that find themselves in the cross-hairs of a major company in a unfriendly consumer court (as we were--because of the campaign contributions going to several of the county commissioners who over-see the court) to find a personal injury attorney with knowledge in strike or SLAPP-suits (and experienced in contract law/real-estate). If the case is in TX get it to a federal court (one of our mistakes). It will cost more, but the judges are further out of reach of the influences of local developer/builders.

Next file a counter-suit immediately (known as a SLAPP-back). Only do this if your case somehow survives early dismissal attempts and summary judgement. We were advised to do this by a SLAPP expert. If we hadn't I don't think they would have tried to settle with us. In our case they did get our home, but they have to pay for it and they did agree to 7 of our 14 presuit conditions, which they refused to do earlier in the case (they also never won a hearing when attempting to injunct or gag us, after several attempts, some threatened in local papers through their attorneys). Since we did sign a confidentiality agreement I can't tell you more, but I do believe this strategy is all that is left to consumers in a state that has so many politicians influenced by this groups money.

Good luck and e-mail us (see below) if you need advice or someone to testify in your case, if god forbid, you ever find yourself in a similar situation. SLAPPs are meant to silence, so don't be silent and keep your fight public through posting on blogs, letters to the editor and, if you can, in newspapers (or t.v. or both).

We will keep you all in our prayers. We are on to more battles currently one with a landfill (going up to 170 ft). Don't let anyone tell you that you should be silent. We won't, not even now!



*****
Chris Calvin, Ph.D.
responsible_dvlpmnt@yahoo.com
http://missouricitychatter.blogspot.com
Co-chair Committee for Responsible Development
Sienna Plantation
Missouri City, TX
Logged
responsible_dvlpmnt
Newbie
*
Posts: 36


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 13, 2007, 09:31:30 am »

Update of the update (or how can JDC screw up the settlement agreement more?):

This is being posted as an educational piece to consumers on how not to ever trust a corporation (or their attorneys). Thus far JDC has not honored a single term of the settlement agreement and they continue to "harass us" evenat this stage of post-settlement. We have had to spend thousands to just get them to agree to honor several of the main points in the agreement, which they haven't yet. Yesterday was like an old cop tv show whereby the police surround the house with guns drawn to drive us out, but in this story they were a slew of real-estate cronies and corporate executives converging on our home for an unauthorized "inspection". Luckily our attorneys called just a few minutes prior and warned us. As I drove up to this "company show of force" (which violates the agreement as far as I'm concerned) I rolled the window down to ask them what they thought they were doing. One of the realtors responded that "she's leaving, she's leaving" in a nervous voice. She just happended to be one of the realtors they used in their SLAPP-suit against us.

It's just hard to believe sometimes we really live in America with such vulchers circling over our homes (BTW, one of the officials present was the Sienna Plantation developer board member and Johnson Development PR Director). I guess they can't wait to waive the flag over our property where our daughter learned to walk and talk and son still rides his trike and smiles with his big dimples (if you saw them you'd just luv 'em, they have no fear of these people).

Defend Your Homes/families Now!!!



*****
Chris Calvin, Ph.D.
Co-chair Committee for Responsible Development
AHRC National Homeowners Advocacy Group Board Member
And average citizen/voter/taxpayer/homeowner/SLAPP-suit victim
Sienna Plantation
Missouri City, TX
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.6 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Search HOBB.org

Home Builder
 Implode-O-Meter

Washington Post
The housing bubble, in four chapters
BusinessWeek Special Reports
Bonfire of the Builders
Homebuilders helped fuel the housing crisis
Housing: That Sinking Feeling

OUTSTANDING FOX4 REPORT
TRCC from Bad to Worse
Case of the Crooked House

TRCC AN ARRESTING EXPERIENCE
The Pat and Bob Egert Building & TRCC Experience 

IS YOUR STATE NEXT?
As Goes Texas So Goes the Nation
Knowledge and Financial Responsibility are still Optional for Texas Home Builders

SpotLight
LiveTalk Internet

Consumer Affairs Builder Complaints

Build it right the first time
An interview with Janet Ahmad

KB Home Bombs
KB Goes Unpunished for Building Community on Bombs
Taxpayers Pay $2.6 Million
KB Attempts to Bribe Woman

Bad Binding Arbitration Experience?
conttribute@hobb.org
 or call 1-210-402-6800

top of page

© 2009 HomeOwners for Better Building
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.